Dissertation Testing

Skip navigationSkip to search

You are here:

Dissertations for Tests and Measurements Education

  • Aceves, Robert I.

    Input quality in Internet delivered education at a large comprehensive university

    Ph.D. thesis, Oklahoma State University.

    View Abstract

  • Achrazoglou, George John

    Assessing teacher preparedness using electronic portfolios and conventional methods

    Ph.D. thesis, The University of Iowa.

    View Abstract

  • Adamson, Katie Anne

    Assessing the reliability of simulation evaluation instruments used in nursing education: A test of concept study

    Ph.D. thesis, Washington State University.

    View Abstract

  • Alfaro, Frank Eduardo

    The relationship of teacher perceptions of the impact of technology integration on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) scores of 9 th –11 th grade students at Alamo Heights Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas

    Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University.

    View Abstract

  • Ali, Usama Sayed Ahmed

    Item selection methods in polytomous computerized adaptive testing

    Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    View Abstract

  • Arend, Bridget D.

    Course assessment practices and student learning strategies in online college courses

    Ph.D. thesis, University of Denver.

    View Abstract

  • Arthurton, Ryan T.

    Computer based testing environments: The development of a protocol for schools

    Ph.D. thesis, University of Delaware.

    View Abstract

  • Asen, Sheryl

    The development of a performance assessment device and accompanying professional handbook for the Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Program

    Ph.D. thesis, George Mason University.

    View Abstract

  • Assiri, Mohammed S.

    Test-taking strategy use on the reading section of the TOEFL iBT: A study of Arab ESL learners

    Ph.D. thesis, Oklahoma State University.

    View Abstract

  • Atchison, Bradley Tilman

    Assistive technology as an accommodation on accountability assessments: An analysis of attitudes and knowledge of special education professionals

    Ph.D. thesis, Kansas State University.

    View Abstract

  • Baek, John Y.

    Exploring the assessment of geological observation with design research

    Doctor of Philosophy thesis, George Mason University.

    View Abstract

  • Ball, John Fredrick

    Tech Prep: A study of high school career and technical students' preparation for college

    Doctor of Education thesis, Idaho State University.

    View Abstract

  • Barnes, Susan Kubic

    Using computer-based testing with young children

    Ph.D. thesis, James Madison University.

    View Abstract

  • Barnette, Andrew T.

    The effect of the computerization of the TOEFL on the English language proficiency testing of international students at the University of Mississippi

    Ph.D. thesis, The University of Mississippi.

    View Abstract

  • Barron, Darlene Hudspeath

    Student progress monitoring: Teachers' perceptions

    Ph.D. thesis, Mississippi State University.

    View Abstract

  • Barrow, Jerry Scott

    Effects of the New Century Education Software on AIMSweb Test Scores in Math Computation and Reading Comprehension for Lower Performing Ninth Grade Students

    Ph.D. thesis, Walden University.

    View Abstract

  • Barzilay, David

    A general formal model for representing test item results

    Master's thesis, Concordia University .

    View Abstract

  • Bebell, Damian John

    Examining and understanding teachers' use of technology

    Ph.D. thesis, Boston College.

    View Abstract

  • Bennett, Jason Paul

    Validity evidence of a computer simulation examination to measure decision-making skills in athletic training

    Ph.D. thesis, Middle Tennessee State University.

    View Abstract

  • Bentley, Joanne Pamela Hall

    Learning Orientation Questionnaire correlation with the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument: A validity study

    Ph.D. thesis, Brigham Young University.

    View Abstract

The T-Test in Dissertation & Thesis Research


     In dissertation or thesis research, there are two types of inferential statistics: parametric and nonparametric tests. Which type you use for your data depends on the type of measurement scale used and how your collected data are distributed.

T-Test Assumptions

     The t-test is a parametric statistic and perhaps one of the simplest analyses used in dissertation and thesis research. Prior to using the t-test, you must make sure that your data does not violate any of the three assumptions underlying the t-test:

  1. The scores in your data represent a random sample from the population under study.
  2. The distribution of the mean of your sample is normal.
  3. The variances of the different groups studied are very similar.
     If your data violates one or more of these assumptions, you may be committing a Type I error more or less often than the alpha probability you set (either .01 or .05). This bias may undermine the value of the t-test, and therefore, the results of your dissertation.

Types of T-Tests

     The t-test is used when your data has only two levels of the independent variable. There is a t-test for dissertations involving experimental designs with randomized groups (independent samples), and another t-test for dissertations with experimental designs involving correlated groups (matched pairs or within-subjects designs). Knowing what kind of sample you have is key to selecting the appropriate t-test for your analyses.

     Let's say that your dissertation involves two groups of people. If you obtained your subjects from multiple locations and assigned each person to be in one group or the other randomly, say through the use of a random numbers table, then you would use the t-test for independent samples in your analysis. If, however, your dissertation is looking at men versus women in an undergraduate introductory psychology course at your school, you must use the t-test for correlated samples in your analysis.

Independent Samples

     For example, let's suppose that your dissertation involves two random groups of people, an experimental group and a control group. You are examining whether seeing a recording artist's face influences how people rate his/her song. All of your subjects listen to the same song. The experimental group sees the artist's face before hearing the song, while the control group does not. You then collect data from the two groups about how well they liked the song on a scale of 1-7. For your analysis, you compute the mean of each group and find that the experimental group's mean is 5.9, while the control group's mean is 4.6.

     For this analysis, you would use the t-test for independent means. The crux of your paper is determining whether the 1.3 difference between these means is a statistically-reliable difference or if the means are different because of sampling error.

Correlated Samples

     Using the above example, let's say your work involved one group of subjects, but each subject listened to the song first, without seeing the artist's face, then rated how much they liked it. Then, the same subject saw the artist's face and listened to the song again. For your analysis, you would use the t-test for correlated samples, because each person in your sample made two observations. Obviously, the ratings for this sample are correlated, because they came from the same individual. This type of experimental design is called a "within-subjects" design.

Calculating Degrees of Freedom

     Once you have calculated the t-score for your groups, you need to know whether these t values are large enough to assume that the difference you found between the two groups is significant. Most statistical packages used for analyses (SPSS, etc.) will provide an alpha level for you. If, for your dissertation, you have set your significance level at .05, any alpha smaller than this means that you have significant findings. Dissertation committees and dissertation chairs love significant results!

     If you do not have a statistical package, you must first find the degrees of freedom for your sample. For the first example given (the between-subjects design), the degrees of freedom is the number of subjects minus two (N-2). You can then use a t-test table, found in most statistics books, to determine the "critical value" of t. If the t value you obtained in your sample is greater than or equal to the t-score in the table matching your degrees of freedom for your sample, then the difference between your two groups' means are statistically different at the alpha level you set.

     If you cannot find a table that has the degrees of freedom you have for your sample, you can use the next lowest degrees of freedom in the table that you have. This strategy is particularly appropriate if your sample is very large and the degrees of freedom for your t-test is quite a bit larger than those found in a table. Another option is to use a statistical calculator to see if the t-value you got for your results is significant.

     In sum, if your dissertation or thesis involves two groups with only two levels of the independent variable, the t-test may be the ideal statistic for your analysis. Choose the appropriate t-test for your analysis based on whether your samples are independent or correlated.

Request Dissertation Statistics Help Today

0 Thoughts to “Dissertation Testing

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *